Maryland Child Custody Minor Child Psychiatrist Testimony Best Interest Lawyers Attorneys
To determine whether to waive doctor-patient privilege for minor child allowing psychiatrist testimony at custody hearing, an attorney should have been appointed to protect the best interest of the child and parents could not have made the waiver.
Going thru a child custody case is one of the most stressful experiences you will go through in your entire life.
The last thing you want to think about after you have been married for a period of time is how you are going to deal with a divorce and all the issues that arise in a child custody case.
If you are in the unfortunate position of having to file for child custody in Maryland or you have been served with a child custody complaint in Maryland, you need the help of an experienced child custody lawyer in Maryland.
The SRIS Law Group Maryland child custody lawyers have a thorough understanding of the child custody laws in Maryland and how the Maryland child custody laws may apply to your case.
Our Maryland child custody attorneys have helped many clients who are going through a child custody case in Maryland.
If you need help with a Maryland child custody case, contact us for help at 888-437-7747.
We have offices in Baltimore & Montgomery County
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
The presumption arising from decree of adoption that custody of adoptive parents best subserves child’s welfare can be overcome by clear testimony. Spencer v. Franks 173 Md. 73, 195 A. 306 Md. (1937).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Clear and affirmative showing that conflicting religious beliefs of parents affect general welfare of child means something more than general testimony of a parent that child is “confused” or “upset” by conflicting religious practices; factual finding of a causal relationship between religious practices and actual or probable harm to child is required; mere conclusions and speculations will not suffice. Kirchner v. Caughey 326 Md. 567, 606 A.2d 257 Md. ,(1992).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Husband’s objection to admission of testimony of his son’s school principal in custody proceeding, on grounds that principal was not put under oath, was waived, where husband did not insist that principal be put under oath, he did not object to or move to strike her testimony, and his attorney had an opportunity to cross-examine the principal. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
8:00 AM – 12:00 AM Midnight
