Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it required parents to maintain diaries recording their personal histories of the implementation of a custody schedule imposed under a divorce decree. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Remand was required in custody proceeding for determination of whether mother was entitled to recover her attorney fees. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Trial court could not order change in custody of minor child approximately eight years after date of divorce decree, since court did not know what the situation of the parents would be in the future. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
The determination of which parent should be awarded custody of a minor child rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
In determining custody of minor child, the courts ordinarily look to the situation as it exists at the time of the hearing. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Husband’s objection to admission of testimony of his son’s school principal in custody proceeding, on grounds that principal was not put under oath, was waived, where husband did not insist that principal be put under oath, he did not object to or move to strike her testimony, and his attorney had an opportunity to cross-examine the principal. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Divorce decree should not have prohibited husband and wife from living at a distance of more than 45 miles apart from one another, since there had been no findings that the best interest of the child required the parents to live within that distance. Schaefer v. Cusack 124 Md.App. 288, 722 A.2d 73 Md.App.,(1998).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
8:00 AM – 12:00 AM Midnight
