Child Custody Lawyer in Virginia, Maryland Massachusetts
Child Visitation Attorney
The Court in Surles v. Mayer, 628 S.E.2d 563(2006), stated that credible evidence supported conclusion that out-of-wedlock child’s best interests would be served by permitting mother to relocate with child; child was happy, adjusted, and well-settled in her new environment, and was involved in several community activities, all of child’s maternal relatives, with whom she had developed close relationships, resided in state where mother had relocated, child’s allergies no longer troubled her, and benefit of child’s relocation outweighed detriment to her relationship with father.
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
Child Custody Lawyer in Virginia, Maryland Massachusetts
Child Visitation Attorney
The Court in Surles v. Mayer, 48 Va. App. 146, 628 S.E.2d 563 (2006) stated that Mother’s former boyfriend, who sought visitation with mother’s out-of-wedlock son, was “person with a legitimate interest” under statute permitting individual not a biological parent of a child to petition for visitation with child if individual is a “person with a legitimate interest”; former boyfriend’s relationship with child was functional equivalent of a “former stepparent,” in that he resided in the same household as child for almost three years, while maintaining a relationship with child’s mother similar to that of husband and wife, and, during this time period, former boyfriend served as child’s primary father figure, and he developed a close relationship with child.
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.
