Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Where both husband and wife in divorce action were able and willing to provide adequate home for their two minor children and give them requisite care and affection, and record disclosed that husband’s present earnings were about $100 a week and that he also received $85 a month from rent of house owned by the parties as tenants by the entireties, custody of both children was awarded to mother and allowance of $30 a week for both children was granted, even though wife was employed. Roussey v. Roussey 210 Md. 261, 123 A.2d 354 Md. (1956).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
In divorce proceedings involving custody of children, chief consideration in regard to custody is always the best interest of the children, and unless the mother is an unfit person, she is usually preferred where children are of tender years. Roussey v. Roussey 210 Md. 261, 123 A.2d 354 Md. (1956).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Even though parties to divorce proceeding can affirmatively waive presence of reporter at interview of children in chambers, better practice is to have reporter present in order that complete record will be available on appeal. Denningham v. Denningham 49 Md.App. 328, 431 A.2d 755 Md.App., (1981).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
In the absence of an allegation of enticement or abduction from the home of the custodial parent, alleged efforts by ex-wife’s domestic partner to undermine ex-husband’s parental authority were not sufficiently compelling to justify the recognition of a tort cause of action for intentional interference with parent/child relations and enticement. Lapides v. Trabbic 134 Md.App. 51, 758 A.2d 1114 Md.App.,(2000).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Presumption that parent who has committed adultery is not proper person to have custody is not an absolute rule and may be overcome by a strong showing that parent is proper person. Shanbarker v. Dalton 251 Md. 252, 247 A.2d 278 Md. (1968).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
In view of evidence that difficulty leading to ultimate breakup of marital home was strong inclination of mother to seek a social life of her own in bars and dance halls, even at expense of depriving her children of those hours of maternal companionship and report of adoption and custody investigator recommending that custody be awarded to father, best interests of minor children dictated that custody be awarded to father on divorce. Kirstukas v. Kirstukas 14 Md.App. 190, 286 A.2d 535 Md.App. (1972).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Where parents had separated, general custody of sisters, aged 12 and 13, held properly awarded to mother rather than father who, having been given children’s custody on alternate weekends, was entitled to reasonable access to children during intervening intervals. Singewald v. Singewald 165 Md. 136, 166 A. 441 Md. (1933).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
On petition, court in divorce case may modify decree relating to children’s custody. Singewald v. Singewald 165 Md. 136, 166 A. 441 Md. (1933).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
In custody cases the facts, not the law, must guide judicial judgment. Daubert v. Daubert 239 Md. 303, 211 A.2d 323 MD. (1965).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland
Child Visitation Attorney
Award of custody of parties’ biological child to mother was not clearly erroneous based on court’s determination that son’s best interests lay in continued relationship with his half-sister, of whom only mother was biological parent, and on trial court’s belief that relationship would not continue to exist were custody of two children divided, in light of acrimonious relationship between parties. Tedesco v. Tedesco 111 Md.App. 648, 683 A.2d 1133 Md.App.,(1996).
If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

