Get Adobe Flash player

Child Custody Law

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

Where both husband and wife in divorce action were able and willing to provide adequate home for their two minor children and give them requisite care and affection, and record disclosed that husband’s present earnings were about $100 a week and that he also received $85 a month from rent of house owned by the parties as tenants by the entireties, custody of both children was awarded to mother and allowance of $30 a week for both children was granted, even though wife was employed. Roussey v. Roussey 210 Md. 261, 123 A.2d 354 Md. (1956).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

In divorce proceedings involving custody of children, chief consideration in regard to custody is always the best interest of the children, and unless the mother is an unfit person, she is usually preferred where children are of tender years. Roussey v. Roussey 210 Md. 261, 123 A.2d 354 Md. (1956).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

Even though parties to divorce proceeding can affirmatively waive presence of reporter at interview of children in chambers, better practice is to have reporter present in order that complete record will be available on appeal. Denningham v. Denningham 49 Md.App. 328, 431 A.2d 755 Md.App., (1981).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

In the absence of an allegation of enticement or abduction from the home of the custodial parent, alleged efforts by ex-wife’s domestic partner to undermine ex-husband’s parental authority were not sufficiently compelling to justify the recognition of a tort cause of action for intentional interference with parent/child relations and enticement. Lapides v. Trabbic 134 Md.App. 51, 758 A.2d 1114 Md.App.,(2000).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

Presumption that parent who has committed adultery is not proper person to have custody is not an absolute rule and may be overcome by a strong showing that parent is proper person. Shanbarker v. Dalton 251 Md. 252, 247 A.2d 278 Md. (1968).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

In view of evidence that difficulty leading to ultimate breakup of marital home was strong inclination of mother to seek a social life of her own in bars and dance halls, even at expense of depriving her children of those hours of maternal companionship and report of adoption and custody investigator recommending that custody be awarded to father, best interests of minor children dictated that custody be awarded to father on divorce. Kirstukas v. Kirstukas 14 Md.App. 190, 286 A.2d 535 Md.App. (1972).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

Where parents had separated, general custody of sisters, aged 12 and 13, held properly awarded to mother rather than father who, having been given children’s custody on alternate weekends, was entitled to reasonable access to children during intervening intervals. Singewald v. Singewald 165 Md. 136, 166 A. 441 Md. (1933).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

On petition, court in divorce case may modify decree relating to children’s custody. Singewald v. Singewald 165 Md. 136, 166 A. 441 Md. (1933).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

In custody cases the facts, not the law, must guide judicial judgment. Daubert v. Daubert 239 Md. 303, 211 A.2d 323 MD. (1965).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Child Visitation Attorney

Award of custody of parties’ biological child to mother was not clearly erroneous based on court’s determination that son’s best interests lay in continued relationship with his half-sister, of whom only mother was biological parent, and on trial court’s belief that relationship would not continue to exist were custody of two children divided, in light of acrimonious relationship between parties. Tedesco v. Tedesco 111 Md.App. 648, 683 A.2d 1133 Md.App.,(1996).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a child custody lawyer in your area.

Child Custody Lawyer in Maryland

Post to Twitter

CLIENT MEETING LOCATIONS

Virginia

Fairfax County 703-278-0405
Prince William County 703-278-0405
Loudoun County 703-278-0405
Fredericksburg 703-278-0405
Richmond 804-201-9009
Virginia beach 757-512-5002
Lynchburg 434-509-4004

Maryland

Rockville 240-399-0304
Baltimore 240-399-0304

Contact Us

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message: or call us 1.888.437.7747 Click To Chat


 

CLIENT MEETING LOCATIONS

                     
  4008 Williamsburg Court
Fairfax, Virginia 22032
Phone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
  201-F Royal Street, SE
Leesburg , Virginia 20175
Phone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
  10432 Balls Ford Rd; Suite 300
Manassas, Virginia 20109
Telephone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
  1 Columbus Center
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462
Phone: 757-512-5002
Get Direction
  12000 Kennedy Lane, STE 106
Fredericksburg, Virginia 22407
Phone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
 
                     
             
  7400 Beaufont Springs Drive,
Suite 300 Richmond, Virginia 23225
Phone: 804-201-9009
Get Direction
  1022 Court Street
Lynchburg, Virginia 24504
Phone: 434-509-4004
Get Direction
  400 East Pratt Street, 8th Floor
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
Phone: 240-399-0304
Get Direction
  1 Research Court, Suite 450
Rockville, Maryland 20850
Phone: 240-399-0304
Get Direction