Child Custody Child Visitation

Maryland Child Custody Lawyers

sris — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:38:41 +0000

The Maryland child custody attorneys of SRIS, P.C. primarily concentrate on Maryland child custody cases throughout the state & can handle your Maryland child custody legal matter no matter where you live - worldwide - as our practice is powered by Internet technology. Contact Us via webmail.

If you are in need of a child custody lawyer in Maryland then turn to the Maryland child custody attorneys of SRIS, P.C. for help. We have offices in Virginia, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, & Massachusetts to better serve you.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:06:42 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

A child custody determination by the trial court must be accorded great deference and should not be disturbed where it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record. Brown v. Marr, 23 A.D.3d 1029, 804 N.Y.S.2d 181 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

Albany County Allegany County Bronx County Broome County Cattaraugus County Cayuga County Chautauqua County Chemung County Chenango County Clinton County Columbia County Cortland County Delaware County Dutchess County Erie County Essex County Franklin County Fulton County Genesee County Greene County Hamilton County Herkimer County Jefferson County Kings County Lewis County Livingston County Madison County Monroe County Montgomery County Nassau County New York County Niagara County Oneida County Onondaga County Ontario County Orange County Orleans County Oswego County Otsego County Putnam County Queens County Rensselaer County Richmond County Rockland County Saint Lawrence County Saratoga County Schenectady County Schoharie County Schuyler County Seneca County Steuben County Suffolk County Sullivan County Tioga County Tompkins County Ulster County Warren County Washington County Wayne County Westchester County Wyoming County Yates County

Tags: child+custody, child+custody+attorneys, child+custody+lawyers, child+custody+laws, New+York+Child+Custody, New+York+City+Child+Custody, New+York+City+Lawyers, New+York+Lawyers, New+York+Attorneys, New+York+Laws, New+York+City+Attorneys, New+York+City+Laws

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:06:31 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

An existing child custody and visitation arrangement that is based upon a stipulation between the parties is entitled to less weight than a disposition after a plenary trial and is only one of many factors to be considered in determining whether modification of custody is appropriate. Brown v. Marr, 23 A.D.3d 1029, 804 N.Y.S.2d 181 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:06:14 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Transfer of sole custody of one of parties’ children from mother, who had been awarded custody pursuant to parties’ stipulation, to father, in modification proceeding, was warranted by changed circumstances and was in best interest of the child; although neither parent was unfit, parties were incapable of cooperating with each other in order to raise the children, making award of joint custody inappropriate, child at issue expressed her desire to live with father and her half-siblings, and, because both parties had other children, an award of custody to either party would necessarily separate child from some of her siblings. Brown v. Marr, 23 A.D.3d 1029, 804 N.Y.S.2d 181 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:05:59 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Family Court’s error in determining that, because existing custody and visitation arrangement was pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the change in circumstances requirement was inapplicable in custody modification proceeding did not require remittal to Family Court, where Court made extensive findings of fact that were supported by the record and demonstrated the requisite significant change in circumstances. Brown v. Marr, 23 A.D.3d 1029, 804 N.Y.S.2d 181 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:05:46 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Where an order of custody and visitation is entered on stipulation, a court cannot modify that order unless a sufficient change in circumstances, since the time of the stipulation, has been established, and then only where a modification would be in the best interests of the children. Brown v. Marr, 23 A.D.3d 1029, 804 N.Y.S.2d 181 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:05:35 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Along with the factors considered in any custody determination, the court must also consider the stability and continuity afforded by maintaining the present arrangement. Lightbody v. Lightbody, 42 A.D.3d 537, 840 N.Y.S.2d 131 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 2007).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:05:20 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

A change in custody should be made only if the totality of the circumstances warrants a change that is in the best interests of the child. Lightbody v. Lightbody, 42 A.D.3d 537, 840 N.Y.S.2d 131 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 2007).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:05:08 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

The authority of the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, is as broad as that of the hearing court, and a custody determination must not stand if it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record. Lightbody v. Lightbody, 42 A.D.3d 537, 840 N.Y.S.2d 131 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 2007).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:04:56 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

A determination by the Family Court with respect to child custody should be accorded great deference on appeal, since the Family Court had the opportunity to assess the witnesses’ demeanor and credibility. Lightbody v. Lightbody, 42 A.D.3d 537, 840 N.Y.S.2d 131 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 2007).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:04:39 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Allowing mother to retain physical custody of child was in child’s best interests, despite fact that father had custody of child’s sibling; mother had been child’s primary caregiver since birth, child attended school on campus where mother worked, and parties had agreed, prior to separating, that mother was to care for child and that child would reside with mother. Lightbody v. Lightbody, 42 A.D.3d 537, 840 N.Y.S.2d 131 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 2007).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:04:27 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

A change of circumstances sufficient to warrant a change in a child custody arrangement may be established when the relationship between joint custodial parents deteriorates to the point where they simply cannot work together for the good of the children. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:04:16 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Although priority must be accorded to the existing custodial agreement, when a prior disposition results from a stipulation that was not based on a best interests analysis, it will not be accorded the same weight as if it resulted from a full hearing. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:04:06 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

A preexisting custodial arrangement, whether established by agreement or order, is a weighty factor, and should be changed based only upon countervailing circumstances on consideration of the totality of circumstances. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 ( N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:03:55 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Current lack of stability of existing custodial arrangement warranted modification of joint custody and visitation order, although existing arrangement had been in place for eight years and the children had thus far excelled, where problems between the parents had exacerbated and now were affecting the children, in that son was not completing his homework assignments, and daughter was becoming a recluse in father’s home and refused to leave her bedroom. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:03:44 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Split physical residency arrangements are appropriate when the best interests of each child lies with a different parent, and courts always must be cognizant of the individual needs of each child. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:03:31 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

In child custody proceedings, courts should be reluctant to separate siblings; however, sometimes there is an overwhelming need for split physical residency arrangements. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:03:18 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Overwhelming need justified modification of custody and visitation order to split primary physical residency of siblings, where it was in daughter’s best interests that she reside with mother, since they shared a special bond and similar interests, daughter’s artistic talents would flourish in mother’s care, and daughter would benefit from structure of mother’s home, while it was in son’s best interests that he continue to reside with father, since they shared similar interests and enjoyed spending time with one another. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:02:56 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Depending on the circumstances, a law guardian may properly attempt to persuade the court in child custody proceedings to adopt a position which, in the law guardian’s independent judgment, would best promote the child’s interest, even if that position is contrary to the wishes of the child. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:02:40 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Although the recommendation of the law guardian is important, it is not determinative upon a petition to modify existing custodial arrangement. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:02:28 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Although a child’s preference, in itself, is not a material change of circumstance sufficient to justify a change in custody from one parent to another, the older and more mature the child, the greater weight will be accorded to the child’s preference.Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 ( N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:02:16 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Children’s preference is one factor to consider in determining where custody should lie. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:02:06 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Daughter’s expressed desire to reside with her mother weighed in favor of modification of custody and visitation order, where she was 14 years old, and, after deliberation, she was able to articulate why living with her mother was in her best interests. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:01:54 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Although keeping children together is often in their best interests, courts must be cognizant of the individual needs of each child. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.

New York Child Custody Attorney

sris — Fri, 09 May 2008 23:01:41 +0000

New York Child Custody Lawyer

Factors which must be considered in ascertaining whether a change in an existing custodial arrangement is in the best interests of children include: (1) the individual needs and expressed desires of the children; (2) the need of the children to live with siblings; (3) the continuity and stability of the existing custodial arrangement, including the relative fitness of the parents and the length of time the present custodial agreement has continued; (4) the quality of the children’s home environment and that of the parent seeking custody; (5) the ability of each parent to provide for the children’s emotional and intellectual development; and (6) the financial status and ability of each parent to provide for the children. Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T., 12 Misc.3d 691, 817 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y.Fam.Ct., 2005).

If you need legal counsel, then contact the New York child custody attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a New York child custody lawyer in your area.